A lawyer’s persepctive
Ezra does an in-depth review (with requisite snark) of the coverage of the Kangaroo Court hearing on Tuesday. He add a lawyerly dose of information, which is mind-boggling to the rest of us, but worth the read.
But why was Tuesday’s hearing limited to just one day?
Again, this matter has been grinding on for four years, more than a year of which was in the Tribunal. Richard Warman, the nominal complainant, was given four days for his examination in chief — that is, four days to make self-serving comments, with Vigna leading him along. Why the sudden impatience? Is it because, with the CHRC’s own conduct on trial, it’s just not as much fun as shooting white supremacist fish in a barrel?
It’s long, folks. Pour yourself a fresh cup of coffee, and take your bathroom break now.
