Being an indecent Muslim apologist, you wouldn’t understand that. You were probably cheering, like so many leftist Canadians. You can’t even address any real issues, just indulge in empty name calling.

Actually, who are “them” and who are “us”? You should get your antecedents straight. It’s simple English.

fjoseph@lerners.ca

Mr. Faisal Joseph, Partner
Lerners PPL, Barriters and Solicitors

Dear Mr. Joseph;

Thank you for once again illustrating to the Canadian public why we must be sure to stand firm in defence of freedom of speech - a concept you and your ‘Canadian Islamic Council’ clients apparently fail to understand. Each time you and your cohorts cry ‘victim’ while attempting to limit our freedom, we grow stronger.

It causes ordinary people - like myself and thousands of others - to let our politicians know that we will not submit nor accept ‘limits’ to our inalienable rights. Each time you cry ‘victim’ I send yet another message to not only my representatives, but to everyone I know… and they then join with me in defence of freedom. I note that the complainant, Dr. Elmasry is apparently too busy to attend to the matter, so he has sent you and his aggrieved little wannabe lawyers to do his bidding.

This complaint will end up where all totalitarians eventually do - in the dustbin of history. Most people leave their place of birth because of too little freedom - they crave more, not less. If you or other members of your ideology have left such a place, you can hardly expect to come to Canada and order us to bend to your will.

If you truly wish less freedom, there are plenty of places which will more than willingly accomodate your request. No double standards allowed.

Randy O’Donnell
Nanaimo, B.C.

——————————————————————————–

Dear Members of Parliament;

Are you concerned about the ever increasing power of HRC’s and the ever diminishing role of free speech in Canadian society due to them? You should be.

Chief Commissioner Barbara Hall can hardly wait for June 30th, when the commissars of the Ontario Human Rights Commission can actively begin searching for ‘incidents’ rather than waiting for ‘aggrieved parties’ to come forward. Commissar Hall recently publically branded Mcleans’s magazine as Islamophobic and hateful, despite having neither jurisdiction nor evidence, saying about her decision “I don’t view it as a chill (to free speech), I view it as responsibility.” Now, get a load of what’s on the Ontario Human Rights Commissions website: a circular argument that denial of racism is racism.

Then read ‘An Anantomy of Surrender’ from City Journal http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_2_cultural_jihadists.html to see where this all leads.
——————————————————————————–

From Mark Steyn’s column of April 12, 2008: http://www.macleans.ca/canada/opinions/article.jsp?content=20080423_31672_31672

“Of course. The act of not acting in an insufficiently non-hateful way can itself be hateful. Whether or not the incident is a non-incident is incidental. I quote from “Concepts Of Race And Racism And Implications For OHRC Policy as published on the OHRC website: “The denial of racism used by so many whites in positions of authority ranging from the supervisor in a work place to the chief of Police and ministers of government must be understood for what it is: an example of White hegemonic power over those considered ‘other.’ ”
Got that? Your denial of racism merely confirms your racism — because simply by being a ” “White hegemon (social, cultural, ideological, or economic influence exerted by a dominant group) ” you wield racist power.”

You should get your facts straight, it’s a pretty simple distinction.

A clear statement of the issue at stake, right girl, no wonder faisal was so uncomfortable in your presence. Great report! Oh, and thanks for getting our Ms. Shaidle out safely and in an unarrested condition:)

Go on girls!!!!

The reasons are quite obvious when you learn the word Hudna.

Truces, Arab Style

“What is being touted as a ‘cease-fire’ is something called a ‘hudna.’ A hudna [also known as a hudibiyya or khudaibiya] is a tactical cease-fire that allows the Arabs to rebuild their terrorist infrastructure in order to be more effective when the “cease-fire” is called off.” — “Cease-fire?” by Shira A. Drissman

Overview
“Kill them so that they know they are dying.” How Prince Jarema Wisniowiecki dealt with envoys who brought a 17th-century hudna proposal
“I would not live in this Commonwealth, for I should be ashamed.” Those who wish to negotiate with vicious enemies like terrorists are shanbiony or shanbiona.
Dialogue of the Athenians and the Melians (Thucydides). The strong need not negotiate at all.
Negotiating with the enemy shows weakness

Noam Chomsky, Tikkun.org, and the Geneva “negotiatiors” as reincarnations of King Henry VI

Neville Chamberlain
Pearl Harbor

I raise my glass and say cheers to you all!!!!

I think I’ll file my own complaints with the CHRC and it’s ugly cousins in AB and BC over every article I find offensive from Muslim papers. Then I’ll make the demand that I as a “white christian” have the right to have a response printed - just as long as we agree on the author.