<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So why was he in minimum security?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://girlontheright.com/2008/04/30/so-why-was-he-in-minimum-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://girlontheright.com/2008/04/30/so-why-was-he-in-minimum-security/</link>
	<description>For girls with pearls... Since 2004</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: INP</title>
		<link>http://girlontheright.com/2008/04/30/so-why-was-he-in-minimum-security/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>INP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlontheright.com/2008/04/30/so-why-was-he-in-minimum-security/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>He wouldn't have gotten away with that shit if Canada was under Sharia law. I recommend the Saudi model. Slightly softer than the Taliban but still plenty tough on stains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He wouldn&#8217;t have gotten away with that shit if Canada was under Sharia law. I recommend the Saudi model. Slightly softer than the Taliban but still plenty tough on stains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

