<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hell hath no fury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://girlontheright.com/2008/05/26/hell-hath-no-fury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://girlontheright.com/2008/05/26/hell-hath-no-fury/</link>
	<description>For girls with pearls... Since 2004</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WL Mackenzie Redux</title>
		<link>http://girlontheright.com/2008/05/26/hell-hath-no-fury/comment-page-1/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>WL Mackenzie Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 14:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlontheright.com/2008/05/26/hell-hath-no-fury/#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>RE: The Toronto Real Estate Board, FD and the asshat Murphy.

Ya know. I think the worls of Connie and Mark, they really are good people. Like me I think they really hate to see the blogosphere turned into a shooting gallery for litigation shysters and nanny state speech control freaks who are offended by nasty words...but I DO think we (bloggers) have to be self policing. At the very least to stave off the feds from doing it for us of killing each other with lawsuits and tattling.

The breaking point between potty mouth political ranting and being a lurking stoolie or a whiney defamation crybaby is a big and significant leap. Once made, it puts the stoolie/sniveller/miscreant in contempt of the free internet community and open to our collective banishment.

Tough talk, rough talk, offensive and potty talk, offending subjects and offensive debate are all part of our freedom in the free fire zone of the internet...and we are in danger of losing that because we allow these stoolies and tyrants surfing among us to remake the rules. As much as we loath some vacant offensive blogger, we have to support their right to be offensive because it's in all our best interests.

Where we should cut toleration point is when these offensive TALKERS turn to being ACTIVE stoolies, spooks, lurkers, suers, spies and general nanny state storm troopers...pissy pants litigants or lurking informants for the internet censors and hate crime racketeers.

At that point the collective blogoshere should use every legal and collective resource available to take down a stoolie or a suer...we need to share and block the IPAs of offenders, we need a bloggers council and a code so we have to self regulate before the feds (and their on-line stoolies, stooges and sycophants) turn this e-freedom into another repressed, bland, over regulated intellectual desert.

I think Murphy is a vacant foul mouthed asshat, and what he did to Free Dominion sucked and was cowardly, bigoted and childish...BUT has he ever ratted FD out to the hate speech racketeers or frivolously sued them?? Does he ever threaten others with this???

If NO, then why should we watch him attacked with the nanny state? If yes, we should be doing everything we can for the take down of an free-net stoolie.

Words don't hurt..seriously they don't, and if you have either the gargantuan or frail ego to be offended by mere words, don't go on the internet, its too much freedom for your emotional and intellectual immaturity to handle...sending a blogger up to the kangaroo courts and tribunals for sheer petty vindictiveness or for venal profit motive...now that's a crime in my book and punishable by banishment by the blogosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: The Toronto Real Estate Board, FD and the asshat Murphy.</p>
<p>Ya know. I think the worls of Connie and Mark, they really are good people. Like me I think they really hate to see the blogosphere turned into a shooting gallery for litigation shysters and nanny state speech control freaks who are offended by nasty words&#8230;but I DO think we (bloggers) have to be self policing. At the very least to stave off the feds from doing it for us of killing each other with lawsuits and tattling.</p>
<p>The breaking point between potty mouth political ranting and being a lurking stoolie or a whiney defamation crybaby is a big and significant leap. Once made, it puts the stoolie/sniveller/miscreant in contempt of the free internet community and open to our collective banishment.</p>
<p>Tough talk, rough talk, offensive and potty talk, offending subjects and offensive debate are all part of our freedom in the free fire zone of the internet&#8230;and we are in danger of losing that because we allow these stoolies and tyrants surfing among us to remake the rules. As much as we loath some vacant offensive blogger, we have to support their right to be offensive because it&#8217;s in all our best interests.</p>
<p>Where we should cut toleration point is when these offensive TALKERS turn to being ACTIVE stoolies, spooks, lurkers, suers, spies and general nanny state storm troopers&#8230;pissy pants litigants or lurking informants for the internet censors and hate crime racketeers.</p>
<p>At that point the collective blogoshere should use every legal and collective resource available to take down a stoolie or a suer&#8230;we need to share and block the IPAs of offenders, we need a bloggers council and a code so we have to self regulate before the feds (and their on-line stoolies, stooges and sycophants) turn this e-freedom into another repressed, bland, over regulated intellectual desert.</p>
<p>I think Murphy is a vacant foul mouthed asshat, and what he did to Free Dominion sucked and was cowardly, bigoted and childish&#8230;BUT has he ever ratted FD out to the hate speech racketeers or frivolously sued them?? Does he ever threaten others with this???</p>
<p>If NO, then why should we watch him attacked with the nanny state? If yes, we should be doing everything we can for the take down of an free-net stoolie.</p>
<p>Words don&#8217;t hurt..seriously they don&#8217;t, and if you have either the gargantuan or frail ego to be offended by mere words, don&#8217;t go on the internet, its too much freedom for your emotional and intellectual immaturity to handle&#8230;sending a blogger up to the kangaroo courts and tribunals for sheer petty vindictiveness or for venal profit motive&#8230;now that&#8217;s a crime in my book and punishable by banishment by the blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
