Another contribution from the Religion of Peaceâ„¢
With a hat tip to Mr. Right who sent me this article earlier today.
A link between terrorism plots and hardcore child pornography is becoming clear after a string of police raids in Britain and across the Continent, an investigation by The Times has discovered. Images of child abuse have been found during Scotland Yard antiterrorism swoops and in big inquiries in Italy and Spain.
Secret coded messages are being embedded into child pornographic images, and paedophile websites are being exploited as a secure way of passing information between terrorists.
The bearded ones have found a way to take two things we in the West deplore - terrorism and child porn - and package it all neatly together. Sweet.
However, it once again proves that Muslims are not the sharpest tools in the shed - although they are tools. I mean, let’s encode the details of our crime inside the details of another crime, because no one will look there? Erm? Very different from committing a diversionary crime, like robbing a store in a neighborhood and while the cops are there, blowing up the police station. No, child pornography ijs something people are vigilantly on the lookout for, and can lead to almost as harsh a sentence as terrorism (harsher, actually, with the way the terror trials have been going). Which is not to say that I’m surprised by the method. After all, Islam was started by a man who screwed a six year old. The practice of child abuse is part and parcel of the religion itself. Upon martyrdom, men are given not only 72 black-eyed virgins, but also young boys. The virgins are for procreation - the boys are for pleasure.
It is not clear whether the terrorists were more interested in the material for personal gratification or were drawn to child porn networks as a secure means of sending messages. In one case fewer than a dozen images were found; in another, 40,000.
British security sources confirmed that such a link had been discovered in several cases. They noted the contradiction between people supposedly devoted to theocracy and Islamic fundamentalism and their use of child pornography. “It shows that these people are very confused,†a source said. “Here they are hating Western decadence but actually making use of it and finding that they enjoy this stuff.â€
Screwing children is a much bigger part of Islam than it is of “Western decadence.” In Egypt and Africa, as well as throughout the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, having young slaves for sexual gratification has been around since time immortal.
I have said this before and I maintain my position: Islam is a cult of sex and death.


Cough cough… Wasn’t Ayesha 9?
Comment by Jim — October 17, 2008 @ 3:22 pm
My most perverted Google searches come from Arabic countries or India. ‘Nuf said.
Comment by Stacy — October 17, 2008 @ 8:49 pm
Jim, you are absolutely right. She was 6 when he married her and the ripe old age of nine when he forced himself up to the hilt on her tiny child’s body. Three years. Big diff.
RG
Comment by Right Girl — October 17, 2008 @ 10:19 pm
[...] ANOTHER contribution from the Religion of Peaceâ„¢ …. [...]
Pingback by Steynian 271 « Free Canuckistan! — October 18, 2008 @ 12:40 pm
May I quote a section of what was written?
“Screwing children is a much bigger part of Islam than it is of “Western decadence.†In Egypt and Africa, as well as throughout the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, having young slaves for sexual gratification has been around since time immortal. I have said this before and I maintain my position: Islam is a cult of sex and death.”
Actually, even “sex” implies SOME degree of personal intimacy. There is no such latitude in an islamic society anymore. It’s ALL about PWER and DEATH. As such, that last paragraph should be amended to read: “Islam is a cult of power and death.”
Just in the spirit of accuracy.
Comment by Pesky Pundit — October 22, 2008 @ 11:28 am
[...] ANOTHER contribution from the Religion of Peaceâ„¢ …. (girlontheright) Possibly related posts: [...]
Pingback by Steynian 272 « Free Canuckistan! — October 22, 2008 @ 4:58 pm
maybe if you didnt belive all the trash u read on the internet, half of which isnt true, you might know that of the women he married, most were widows, and aisha was the only girl under the age of 17. besides that fact, his marriage to her wasnt one of sexual gratification, it was a merger between two families. if you were to look into history, you would also see that up until as late as 1929, there was no age limit for marriage as long as the parents gave their consent. to be comparing todays society to that of one over 1000 years ago is retarded. so in future, make sure u know the facts before insulting the name of a man who is looked upto and revered by many. its called respect.
Comment by Rae — November 14, 2009 @ 11:20 am