In the UK, a young boy aged just 13 years old became a father via his 15 year old girlfriend. Well, at least they think he’s the father. It could be one of the other six guys she was shagging.

To add insult to grievous injury, parents are now being told by leaders of Britain´s Department of Children, Schools and Family that they shouldn’t try to instill sexual values in their children. Instead they should “NOT tell their children what is ‘right or wrong’ about having sex,” but simply serve up information about methods of contraception.

It’s as if Britain has given up on its kids as kids. They are sexualized little adults now, running around the Isles humping and breeding like bunnies.

However, Britain’s shoulder shrugging where child sexuality is concerned isn’t consistent. And that’s what bugs me.

A 15-year-old schoolgirl earned almost £100,000 a year working as a high-class prostitute, it was revealed yesterday.

By day the teenager attended classes but at night she was regularly paid hundreds of pounds for sex.

The girl, who cannot be identified because of her age, is believed to have been working for an escort agency based in Newcastle.

She lied about her age before going on to earn £1,700 a week, meeting dozens of men on school nights and at the weekend.

Her double life was exposed in November when a suspicious teacher searched her schoolbag and found condoms, a card with the name of her pimp and details of the agency she worked for.

The school alerted police and officers later searched the £200,000 family home in South Tyneside, finding £8,060 in cash hidden in the loft, a court heard.

She obviously comes from a decent family, à la Amy Fisher. She keeps up with schoolwork and isn’t a bad child in the sense we know. But she’s underage - an innocent.

Most of you, my readers, know of my past in the sex industry. What you don’t know is that in my teen years, I was using that same entrepreneurial spirit to get what I wanted. It wasn’t cash, but there was definitely a barter system in place. I’ll give you this if you give me that. It’s actually how I passed math. I looked after my body and my sexual health, never got pregnant, never sat around popping out illegitimate brats in a council estate on the taxpayer dime.

So was I an innocent? Or was I sexualized at a young age? I think we all know the answer to that one.

So from an objective perspective, knowing what we know of the way Britain is encouraging its children to hump indiscriminately, what did this 15 year old girl do that was so bad? Was it that she didn’t get knocked up and collect welfare? Was it that she may not have been a victim at all? I sure wasn’t. She followed the rules: used condoms, kept up with her “real life”… the only thing she did wrong was to not depend on the state or cry victimhood.

Britain needs to decide whose side it’s on when it comes to kids and sex. Because right now, their message is more than a little mixed.

Go kill some Jews.

The United States plans to offer more than $900 million to help rebuild Gaza after Israel’s invasion and to strengthen the Western-backed Palestinian Authority, U.S. officials said on Monday.

The money, which needs U.S. congressional approval, will be distributed through U.N. and other bodies and not via the militant group Hamas, which rules Gaza, said one official.

“This money is for Gaza and to help strengthen the Palestinian Authority. It is not going to go to Hamas,” said the official, who asked not to be named as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton planned to announce the funding at a donors’ conference in Egypt next week.

I do not believe for one millisecond that this money will go 100% to aid, and not into weapons and ammo for Jew hunting, a favorite Gazan pastime.

Download MP3

My latest at Examiner.com.

CPAC is like an all-inclusive vacation for conservatives. You pay for your hotel and your conference ticket, put on a suit and your conference lanyard, and watch the drinks and dinners miraculously appear. Anywhere within a 3 mile radius of the Omni Shoreham Hotel in DC, if you walk into a bar, someone from the convention will be running a tab, and will welcome you to their party. There are lunch’n'learn events each day with refreshment, star-studded dinners on Thursday and Friday nights, and usually a party in someone’s hotel room after hours.

It’s like what you see on MTV’s Spring Break, but with pearls and navy blue suits.

Thanks for clicking over and making me look fab to the editors at Examiner.

When pointing out the obvious becomes racially divisive, the problem isn’t with racism: It’s with the ability to face facts.

Now, competitive middle-schoolers in Florida are flocking to sign up for high-school classes.

For parents and students, it’s a great chance to get ahead. And school districts have something else to brag about: seventh- and eighth-graders completing courses such as Algebra II Honors and biology that had been reserved primarily for ninth- and 10th-graders.

But the nation’s foremost scholars in middle-school education are worried the fast-growing trend is leaving minority children behind. They also question whether the practice is legal because, nationwide, it has tended to result in students being segregated by race.

Legal? These courses aren’t mandatory. Parents and kids sit down together to decide what courses the kids should take, if any. If the parents or children (or both) show no interest in speeding up the learning process voluntarily, then that’s their choice. It certainly isn’t illegal.

When those in social jobs like teaching and counseling talk of equality, they don’t mean equality of opportunity. We already have that: All kids, black, white or green, can go to school and get a basic education. The social nannies mean equality of outcome. Give everyone a medal, even if they played poorly. Get everyone into advanced education, even if they can barely read or have no interest. And if that advanced education is too hard for them, either dumb it down or cancel it altogether.

Every night before bed, Bug and I spend about a half hour or so playing with the Former-First-Lady-Former-Senator-Current-Secretary-of-State Hillary Clinton chew toy. He’s got one of her legs about ripped off, and it pleases me to see her face caught in the grip of his little jaws.

Now I’m pleased to see there’s another I shall have to add to Bug’s chomping collection: The Obama chew toy!

I’m stealing this entire thing from Kathy. I’m sure she won’t mind.

1. If you believe that general intelligence exists, is heritable and at all testable for, you’re a racist.
2. If you point out that liberal philosophies and programs intended to have a good impact have had a disproportionately bad impact on the ethnicities targeted by liberals, you’re a racist.
3. If you notice that other cultures have some problems, you’re a racist.
4. If you notice your own culture has had some successes, you’re a racist.
5. If you try to identify subcultural problems, you’re a racist. If the problems existed or got worse under liberalism, see item 2, above.
6. If you’re mainstream American culture, and don’t hate that culture, you’re a racist.
7. If you’re capable of noting unpleasant facts about subcultures and discussing them without your brain fogging, you’re a racist.
8. If you won’t kowtow and grovel as soon as someone accuses you of racism for one of the reasons above, you’re a hopeless racist.
9. If you do not believe that mankind is a tabula rasa for liberals to make whatever they think would be good to make of man, this week, you’re a racist.
10. If you don’t take personal responsibility for all the evils of slavery, you’re a racist. This is true even if you only arrived from Poland last week.
11. If you’re white, you’re a racist.
12. If you’re white and just arrived from Poland last week and don’t accept that you’re a racist, you’re a racist.
13. If you try to interject logical thought into a discussion of culture, you’re a racist.
14. If you refuse to admit culture is a racial matter, and a liberal wants to conflate the two, you’re a racist.
15. If you believe that race and culture are indistinguishable and a liberal decides that you shouldn’t conflate the two, you’re a racist.
16. If you believe that black or hispanic girls who are paid by liberal inspired programs from the age of 13 to have babies will have babies, you’re a racist.
17. If you believe that _any_ girls of whatever color who are paid to have babies will then have babies but then, insensitively, observe that a smaller percentage of white girls do, most likely because the liberals haven’t targeted them for quite so much attention, you’re a racist.
18. If it doesn’t bother you that the truth offends liberals, you’re a racist.
19. If you read The Bell Curve, you’re a racist. On the other hand, if you didn’t read it but wrote a scathing review on Amazon anyway you might not be a racist provided you take personal responsibility for 300 years of slavery even if you just arrived from Poland last week.

In other “Kathy’s a Racist” news, Steve Paikin reminds us that Warren Kinsella can sometimes act like a spoiled, whiny child with a toothache. He also lets us know that he (Paikin) will not bow to threats of censorship:

Later that same day, I received another email from Warren informing me that he was emailing the Minister of Education to ask her to pressure us to “unbook” Kathy Shaidle, and that if we didn’t, there would be significant consequences for TVO and The Agenda. He did, indeed, email the Minister.

Well, now we’ve got a different story, right? Now, it’s no longer a story about the appropriateness of our choosing Kathy to appear on the program. Now it’s a story about a well known Liberal Party operative threatening us (with what? We didn’t know) unless we did what he said.

That’s a very different story and as a result, we naturally refused to “unbook” Kathy. We do not take our marching orders on whom to put on or take off our television program from anyone, but most assuredly, not from partisan political operatives with personal grudges (Warren’s tangle with Kathy, I’ve learned, goes back awhile).

I wonder how Warren would feel if he was “unbooked” for an appearance somewhere based on the fact that he believes Canada’s large Chinese community eat and serve catmeat.

Last year, when I was broke and facing eviction. I really don’t know what I would have done if I had a couple of toddlers hanging off me. Even with all your help.

Anyway, if you can spare a couple bucks heading into Lent, please pass by my friend Rick’s. Hit his paypal tip jar (halfway down the right sidebar, and modestly small) and let him get his new glasses.

As background, Rick was a working journalist for a big company until about two weeks ago, when he was replaced with an unpaid intern. Thankfully this means he can take some time to devote to his blog, where he’s able to write way better stuff than he ever was permitted at the paper.

He did a great interview with Mark Steyn the day Mark was in town and hanging out with us cool kids.

Thanks.

My latest at the Examiner.com, on how the US deficit will top $1 trillion in the first quarter of the year. And say, what is “discretionary spending,” anyhow?

While R. Allen Stanford’s investors were swallowing claims of vast returns on safe investments, some of his employees weren’t so sure.

And though one of them tried as early as 2003 to pass on to regulators his concerns about the bank, nothing came of it until Stanford’s operations were raided and shut down Tuesday.

The Texas billionaire with a reputation for jet-setting and lavish spending faces civil charges for allegedly lying about his investment strategy. But in 2003, when his offshore banking empire was exploding in size, even asking managers one question too many could get you fired, Miami broker Charles Hazlett said.

I admit I’ve never heard of this Stanford fellow, but then again, I’m hardly part of the jet-set investment crowd.

It seems the SEC has been after Stanford - a large donor in Obama’s presidential campaign - for some time, finally catching up with him in Virginia. His investment scheme was $8M, making him much smaller than Madoff at $50M, but no less vile. According to Bloomberg, he and his employees donated over $30,000 to Obama. Obama gave some of the tainted money to charity.

CORRECTION: Silly me, putting “M”s where there should have been “B”s. Both Madoff and Stanford stole money in the BILLIONS, not MILLIONS! Thanks to Andre in the comments for pointing it out.

Patrick Corrigan in today’s Toronto Star.

Shares of Citigroup and Bank of America fell in premarket trade on Friday on the fear that the banks would be nationalized, according to traders.

Herr Hopenchange hasn’t actually told us how he thinks nationalizing the banking industry will help the American/World economy.

In the meantime, the House Republicans are planning on tracking the spending of every penny from the stimulus to be sure that nothing goes astray. You’ll remember that no GOP members of the House voted for the pork’n'beans bill. They will set up a “stimulus watch program” in response to the government’s “recovery.gov” which helps taxpayers track the stimulus money. Like a governmental Where’s Waldo, if you will. Or NORAD’s tracking of Santa on Christmas Eve.

Thanks for clicking over and increasing my stature within the Examiner community. I’m new over there, and your clicks really help build me up.

According to Vlad, who is stuck in Ottawa for the Northern version of Obamapalooza.

Lots on the go today, so not much time to dedicate to all y’all, my glorious RightGirl readers. But I’m around. You can catch me in the following places:

Today.com - The Surreal Life (Bobby Ewing in my shower)

Examiner.com - The Three Little Pigs of Porkulus

LadyBlog - RIP Loki Rourke (a little death can leave big grief)

In other linky news, I read this yesterday and it depressed me, given that this blog just had a birthday. But it’s an interesting exercise for devoted bloggers. I may try it, when a bit more time passes from my Blogaversary.

If Your Blog Died Today…. What Would It Be Remembered For?

Because I always wanted that as a title of a blog post.

Ok, I’m done. Catch ya later.

Let me first make it clear that I do not believe in the banning of books. Not Mein Kampf, and not that piece of putrefying hatred called the Koran. All books have a place, even if it is only in history.

That said, if ever there was an argument for banning the Koran, this would be it.

When a war is being waged against your country, propaganda for the enemy is forbidden. It is a condition of victory. We have to come to terms with the fact that war has been foisted upon us. The strategy to oppose it is entirely different from what would apply in normal times.

*****

Many people think the Koran is just another book, or just another religious text, or just another expression of one’s opinion. It is not. It is a casus belli from the Muslim standpoint, as are any goalposts that Muslims will gladly plant and move forward, in their strategy of conquest of kuffar territory.

As with Geert Wilders’ argument that if Mein Kampf can be banned for inciting hatred against Jews, so too should the Koran, this argument is good. It is sound. I don’t agree with the principle behind it, but I admit that it makes sense. Until such time as we can declare victory over our enemy and reassert our own cultural values, it seems ridiculous that we should be promoting and allowing the promotion of the very message that inflames our enemy to so much hatred.

Propaganda. Does the Koran fit the description?

1capitalized : a congregation of the Roman curia having jurisdiction over missionary territories and related institutions
2: the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3: ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one’s cause or to damage an opposing cause ; also : a public action having such an effect

Download MP3

I would personally like to invite all citizens of Chad to go live in Big Al Gore’s mansion. It has plenty of hot & cold running water, and uses electricity by the bazilowatt. Best of all, you will be fully protected from the ManBearPig. I’m cereal.

Few climate actions, however, come close to the travesty being played out in nearby Chad. There the government has banned the manufacture, importation and use of charcoal – the sole source of fuel for 99% of Chadians.

“Cooking is a fundamental necessity for every household,” its Environment Minister pronounced. But “with climate change every citizen must protect his environment.”

The edict has sent women and children scavenging for dead branches, cow dung, grass and anything else that burns. “People cannot cook,” said human rights activist Merlin Totinon Nguebetan. “Women giving birth cannot even find a bit of charcoal to heat water for washing,” said another.

The government admitted it had failed to prepare the public for its sudden decree, but announced no change in plans – saying only that scarce propane might be an alternative for some. When citizens protested, they were violently dispersed by police.

No need, Chadians, to bring your own cow dung. Al Gore has enough bullshit for everyone.

This is the law of unintended consequences. When white liberal guilt over some imaginary wrong (be it Native rights, spanking kids, peanut allergies or global warming) gets out of hand, it is always the very poorest who suffer. No, not TaLinda and DaShawn in some ghetto slum paid for with welfare dough in a rich city in a rich country like America. I mean places like Africa, where people are really poor, but it doesn’t matter because we can’t see them, so fuck ‘em.

We scream about the atrocities in Darfur, but the best we can send by way of aid is Matt Damon. We wail about what happened in Rwanda, yet it was white liberals who tied the hands of the UN forces and made them impotent. We worry about the millions of deaths caused by malaria, but cannot bring ourselves to use DDT, lest a few hundred people have a bad reaction to it and die. We lament about the amount of people who contract AIDS, but we pooh-pooh Uganda’s successful ABC (Abstinence, Be faithful, use Condoms) abstinence education (pretty simple, really: If you don’t have sex, you don’t get sexual diseases).

Time after time our experiments in white guilt have led to things we really ought to feel guilty about. But because they happen so far away, we really don’t care. Let ‘em starve. Let the women and babies have their infections because the most rudimentary disinfection provided by boiling water has been denied. At least we won’t be using coal, which will hurt people.