Skip Navigation.

White Man Justice

The disgusting drunken reprobate who froze his baby daughters to death won’t be getting the smudge stick and lifetime supply of feathers that his idiot peers suggested as punishment. Instead some mean white judge decided that a criminal should go to jail. Imagine that.

A Saskatchewan father who drunkenly lost his two young daughters outside in a snowstorm has been handed a three-year jail sentence for their deaths.

Christopher Pauchay, 25, pleaded guilty to criminal negligence causing death after his daughters — three-year-old Kaydance and one-year-old Santana — were found buried in snowdrifts in January of last year.

The prison term comes despite calls from an aboriginal sentencing circle that Pauchay be spared jail time and be allowed to heal in his community.

Dear Injun “Leaders”: You have proven yourselves useless, and will not be allowed at the adults’ table again. Too bad, so sad. Here’s a feather.

10 Comments - Join in the conversation below »

  1. What a fucktard, he should lose his Injun cred immediately.

    Comment by Two Dogs — March 6, 2009 @ 10:11 pm

  2. He is lucky I was not the Judge. He would have got 30 years and his dick cut off so that he could not ever put future kids of his at risk.

    Comment by Bob Devine — March 6, 2009 @ 11:58 pm

  3. Only three years?! What a country.

    Comment by BillyHW — March 7, 2009 @ 2:45 am

  4. Hmmm… In Mega City 1, he’d have gotten 60 years for letting those poor kids die, plus another 10 for being drunk.

    I think we Judges need to enforce Big Meg law here…

    Judge Dwyer.

    Comment by Jack Dwyer — March 7, 2009 @ 3:19 am

  5. What BillyHW said: Three years is pathetic.

    Now three years plus the feather thing…

    Comment by Brian Gardiner — March 7, 2009 @ 9:28 am

  6. Good. Either he lives in Canada or he doesn’t. Everyone in Canada should be subject to Canadian law, regardless of race/ethnicity/past victimhood of ancestors.

    This idea that native culture was and is superior to ours, and should be above Canadian law, is baloney.

    Comment by Joanne — March 7, 2009 @ 9:47 am

  7. “Pauchay’s lawyer had argued that sending the father to prison would only hurt his family.”
    … Riiiight, ’cause it makes perfect sense that sending the moron who killed two of his kids through sheer, drunken stupidity back to play with an infant is obviously the better course of action than, say, keeping him someplace where he can’t give a repeat performance. If this guy was seriously drunk enough that taking his kids out into a freezing snowstorm seemed like a bright idea, I’d say he has some issues that need worked out before he’s let anywhere near that baby.

    As for the sentence, I’d like a little provision on there that he goes straight back to prison for half a year anytime he so much as touches alcohol.

    Comment by Cortillaen — March 7, 2009 @ 1:47 pm

  8. Just goes to show how cheap life has become in this Nation. Two children are just so much dirt. Meanwhile the killer is wept over. Hey I guess this guy is a teddy bear compared to the guts it takes to suck a babies brains out while being born by so called “Doctors”.
    Good on the Judge but even the small time he was given is a slap in the face to Justice or the memory of these children.
    JMO

    Comment by Revnant Dream — March 8, 2009 @ 4:06 pm

  9. I think these “circles” are a great idea. As a Jew, I’d like to be part of one of these Jewish sentencing circles where the penalties gien ought would vary from having to watch Fiddler on the Roof for a month with no break, to having to give up chicken soup AND Matzah balls for 3 years. Due to its extreme severity, the latter sentence would be for the most hideous crimes, of course.
    Works for me!

    Comment by Andre — March 9, 2009 @ 11:40 am

  10. should have spellchecked….
    I meant “where the penalties given out would vary….”

    Comment by Andre — March 9, 2009 @ 11:41 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment