Forty comments overnight? Some of you screaming FASCIST!!!11one! because I don’t stay awake to approve you the very second you comment?

A few things before I shut down comments on this post:

1. I’m shutting them down because I’m bored. Really bored. When it became the same (to use the devil’s own turn of phrase, which I hope makes him smile in his angry little world) “pants-pissing” round-and-round that it has been since yesterday, we’re not getting anywhere. Especially since these are conversations better had with a legal expert. And I’m bored. And it’s my blog.

2. Harassment of anyone’s kids is not cool. And yes, spurious child services claims, which is what contacting the Evans’ kids’ teachers would have been, tear families apart. CC himself has apologized for this today, which shocked the shit out of me. There is NO excuse for that. Ever. It is the quintessential “fire in a crowded theater” you lefties are always bringing up when trying to shut down free speech. Learn what it means. it means what CC called for on Richard’s kids.

3. Going from memory alone would only be good enough if I were a minority trying to get government money for pain and suffering from 50 years ago. So therefore I withdraw CC’s (and BnR, for that matter) name from my bare recollection of the Pederastia website kerfuffle from pre-2006 (which is as far back as this email account goes).

4. Not that anyone at this point cares, but it may serve you to keep in mind that revolting as they are, NAMBLA is NOT illegal in Canada or the United States. They gross normal people the fuck out, but that was the point - to revolt. But unlike Hezbollah (whose flag flies proudly at anti-Jew demonstrations across the country) they are not listed as illegal in Canada. Sorry Robert, but I doubt there’s a claim to be made there. Again, discuss it with a lawyer. I don’t even play one on TV.

5. Sparky, congrats on the birth of your son! Sleep will never mean the same thing again.

6. A few of you have commented that Richard makes women’s lives miserable. I’m going to bring up a few names, so bare with me: Suzanne Fortin. Sandy Crux. Denyse O’Leary. Hunter. Wendy Sullivan. These are women that Robert Day has made miserable with his day after day misogynistic abuse. I’m sure there have been others, but I make my point. If Robert worked in an office with a Christian pro-life woman, would he call her a cunt all day? No. But Canadian Cynic felt it was his due to say that of Suzanne Fortin from the comfort of his keyboard.

7. Robert Day/Canadian Cynic has NEVER been welcome here. This post is not unique in that respect. His every utterance brings to mind a backed-up toilet, and since he can’t be plumbed, he has been banned. His free speech has not been infringed upon - he and his sub-trolls still have a voice at canadiancynic.blogspot.com - go check them out there!

8. Bored. Really.

RG

and with that- congratulations on your newborn son. I wish you and your family all the best.

I have neither condoned or condemned Richard Evans’ actions. They are not relevant, as stated ad nauseum, to the issue of advocating harm to his children.

As to the question of whether what CC wrote constitutes advocating harm if you even have to ask the question you are either being hopelessly and deliberately obtuse or your partisanship has blinded you beyond all reason.

“Sparky, are you being deliberately obtuse or is it just, as your posts suggest, just a right v left type thing with you?”

At 11:44 Sparky replied:

“Point in there where there’s intent to harm the kids?”

At 11:05 Sparky wrote:

““Hey Phantom,
Wanna know why it’s hard to take those on the ‘right’ seriously when say, well, anything?”

We have our answer….both.

Please indicate which of my comments professes a preference for ideology of any stripe. I would hope that ethical behaviour and an understanding that children are sacrosanct is a tenet of those on the left, right or anywhere in between.

I presumed to take the high road as you and your confreres have expropriated the low road for yourselves.

I’m thinking maybe a mass e-mailing to school board members. Perhaps notes to the teachers. Or, heck, why stop there? How about a mass delivery of eye-opening flyers in local mailboxes? Yup, I bet that would get someone’s attention. (”Dear concerned parent: Let’s talk about Richard Evans, shall we?”)

From CC:

Sparky, are you being deliberately obtuse or is it just, as your posts suggest, just a right v left type thing with you?

Adults are free to have at each other and face the consequences.

Nothing, I repeat NOTHING, justifies incitement to inflict harm on Richard Evan’s or anyone elses children.

All else in this context is blather and bloviation. My opinion, or anyone elses, on the the re-direct to NAMBLA or any related dispute is irrelevant to the issue of involving children.

According to Sparky, CC comes right out and says of his little “tiff” with Richard: “So, out of a sense of absolute frustration, I snapped and wrote something stupid…” about a man’s kids.

aka, “That meany, he MADE me do the bad thing!”

I can’t imagine what excuse he’s got for directing terrorists to a -woman’s- home address, probably something just as compelling.

See, once I can attribute to mere stupidity, twice to exceptional stupidity, but he does this kind of crap a lot. He’s been doing it on -my- blog, which nobody even reads. Doing it badly, but definitely doing it. Logs don’t lie, big boy.

But there’s ol Sparky, covering for the guy anyway. So Spark, buddy. You still wonder why conservatives oppose gun control? Its because people try to send terrorists to our houses, and people like you try to pretend its ok.