All Canadian taxpayers are. Isn’t that wild? This year, Canada is funding a queer child porn, via my tax dollars and yours. Thanks to Blazing Cat Fur for bringing this little business venture to my attention.

At this year’s InsideOut, Toronto’s Gay & Lesbian film fest that took place in May, a movie called “Babysitting Andy” was screened.

What do you do if you’re nine and nobody will tell you what ’fellatio’ means? When Andy’s uncle and his boyfriend arrive to babysit, she corners them with a Supersoaker and they can do nothing but comply.

Well, I’m going to contact cybertips.ca and turn myself in. I urge all Canadians to do the same. Turn yourselves in and take your lumps as child pornographers.

As an aside, when Ezra prints cartoons of Mohammad, that’s a hate crime. But when the government funds child pornography, that’s “art“.

While these poor kids’ mother is hardly a brilliant parent, if, as Dawg conjectures, the rule is “teach hate, lose kids” then her capacity as a parent is not in issue one way or another. So on that basis the Khadr’s would have lost their kids the instant the authorities became aware of the jihadi views of the parents. I certainly hope Mohamed Elmasry doesn’t have kids because his political/religious views might count as hatred. Anti-Zionist? Lose your kids. Black mother in the Jane Finch corridor blaming whitey for black peoples’ problems - better watch her step. Catholics and fundamentalist who teach their children that abortion is murder and abortionists murderers…no kids for you! Environmentalists who tell their children that the people who run big corporations are killing the Earth and should go to jail…kidless.

But, and one cannot help but notice what this lame brained mum did, maybe we should set the standard higher. Perhaps the test should be that you have to actually do something like draw on your kids. (Frankly I’d start with the parents of the cringing little moppets who are stuck having their faces painted for National holidays.) For example telling your female children that they have to wear a head scarf (or a sack) or Uncle Ali will be over to behead them? Perhaps it would make sense for teachers, as soon as they see a little Muslim girl wearing the hajib to ask if Fatima really wants to wear it and to keep pushing until they are absolutely certain Fatima is not being coerced at home.

I can’t help but think there are far more dangerous parents in Canada who should never have been able to hang onto their children. But then again, that would be politically improper to say, wouldn’t it? Easier just to go after the crazy white bitch.

A 12-year old girl hasn’t yet hit puberty, but because she’s threatening to hold her breath till she turns blue, her mother and doctors will give her whatever she asks for. In this case, a sex change.

The girl is one of the youngest patients in Australia granted permission to begin a sex swap.

The court was told early intervention was needed because the child was stressed and anxious at the prospect of starting her period and had threatened self-harm.

Sounds like she needs a good spanking, followed by a talk about the birds and the bees, instead of a complete gender reassignment. First of all, the mother is afraid of her own child, and of standing up to her. Second, what ever happened to the notion of tomboy? Most girls who prefer to be boys grow up to marry boys. And what of the ones that don’t? Well, when they are 25 or whatever, they can make the decision to become boys. But not at 12.

A few things that weren’t permitted to me over the years: I could not get laser eye surgery before I was 21, because my eyes had not yet finished developing and changing. I was not permitted tubal ligation under the age of 35, in case I changed my mind (which I have done - and she may do so too). Voting. Marrying Gordie from across the street when I was 4.

Now, I may have whined and stomped my feet, or even held my breath till I turned blue, but these things just weren’t going to happen. Not unless I found an unethical quack to do them. And frankly, who wants their life in the hands of an unethical quack?

This story sounds more like failed parenting as the result of a divorce than any inherent need in the child. She’s crying out for attention, and her mother is indulging her whims. Why not just get her a pony and be done with it? Or better yet: Instead of giving her everything her confused little heart desires, why not give her some discipline and some boundaries?

H/t: Kathy

Are your children happy? In one of the grossest displays of nanny-statism, British schools are introducing “happiness tests” for children as young as four years old.

Children as young as four are to take “happiness tests” in a controversial drive to force schools to improve the well-being of pupils, it has emerged.

Thousands of youngsters are expected to be quizzed on whether they are feeling optimistic, confident, loved and interested in other people.

They will be set questionnaires similar to the self-help quizzes found in women’s magazines to check they are “feeling good about myself” and “dealing with problems well”.

Tellingly, the article does not advise what happens if a child is deemed “unhappy”. I assume the Labour-government thought-police will saunter in to remove the child from his unhappy environment and send him to a Labour Youth training and indoctrination camp. Chilling.

The Government’s £20million emotional literacy initiative encourages activities such as “worry boxes”, where pupils write down their anxieties and post them into a box, and “emotional barometers”,

If I were still paying taxes in Britain, I’d want my money back.